Africa/Nairobi
Projects

Manuscript Structure, See our Guidelines

image
May 5, 2025
Please be sure to follow this structure to ensure successful submission and publication of your academic work. All submission must have a visible Title, that leverages a font size of at least 24-46. All authors should be declared right below the title to enhance their visibility during indexing. The abstract must paint a clear picture of the entire manuscript. Place sufficient focus on the problem your work intends to solve, the research gap, literature findings, research methodology, results and discussions, and finally, your concluding remarks.
  • Problem Statement: In this section, researchers should identify the key issue or gap in current knowledge that their study addresses. They should clearly articulate why this problem is significant, contextualize it within existing research or practice, and state how their work seeks to advance understanding or practice in this area.
  • Significance of the Study: Researchers should explain why their work is important. This includes discussing how the study’s findings might contribute to knowledge, influence policy, or improve practice in the relevant field. They should highlight the broader implications of the study and its potential to make a meaningful impact.
  • Research Objectives: Authors should list the specific aims of their study. These objectives should be concise, measurable, and directly related to the problem statement. This section should also clarify what the research seeks to accomplish or what questions it aims to answer.
  • Research Hypothesis: Here, authors should state their research hypothesis or guiding proposition. This should be a clear, testable statement predicting an outcome based on prior knowledge or theoretical frameworks. If the study is exploratory and doesn’t have a hypothesis, authors should instead state the guiding research question.
  • Introduction to the Topic: Begin with a general overview of the topic or field, explaining why it’s important and relevant to your research.
  • Key Themes and Concepts: Identify and summarize the main themes, ideas, or frameworks that have shaped existing research on this topic.
  • Previous Studies and Findings: Discuss key studies or influential works, summarizing their findings and relevance to your own research. Focus on both historical and recent contributions.
  • Methodologies Used: Briefly note common methodologies or approaches in previous studies and how they influenced the field.
  • Gaps in the Literature: Highlight areas where existing research is lacking, inconsistent, or has unresolved questions. Clearly link these gaps to the motivation for your own study.
  • Theoretical or Conceptual Framework: If applicable, outline any theoretical frameworks or models you’ll use and how these have been applied or critiqued in existing literature.
  • Critical Analysis and Synthesis: Rather than just summarizing, analyze how previous works relate to each other and to your research question. Identify strengths, weaknesses, or controversies in the existing scholarship.
  • Link to Your Study: Conclude by clearly explaining how the reviewed literature informs your research objectives, methodology, or hypothesis. Make sure this sets the stage for the rest of your paper.
  • Research Design: Start by describing the overall design of your study (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) and explain why this approach is appropriate for addressing your research objectives.
  • Study Population and Sampling: Clearly define the target population or data source for your research. Detail how participants, cases, or data points were selected (sampling method) and justify why this sample is suitable for your study.
  • Data Collection Methods: Provide a clear description of how data were gathered. This may include surveys, interviews, experiments, observations, or document reviews. Specify any instruments or tools used and how they were developed or adapted.
  • Data Analysis Techniques: Explain the techniques or procedures you used to analyze the data (e.g., statistical tests, thematic analysis, coding). Justify your choice of methods and describe any software or tools used in the analysis.
  • Ethical Considerations: Discuss the ethical issues relevant to your research, such as informed consent, confidentiality, or data security. Explain how you addressed these issues in line with recognized ethical standards.
  • Limitations of the Methodology: Briefly acknowledge any potential limitations or challenges with your chosen methods. Note how these limitations might affect the interpretation of your findings.
  • Link to Your Study Objectives: Conclude by clearly linking your methodology to your research objectives and hypothesis. Emphasize how your chosen methods enable you to effectively address the problem or questions outlined in your study.
  • Introduction to Results: Start with a brief overview of the key findings to orient the reader before diving into the details.
  • Presentation of Results: Clearly present your findings in a logical order, typically following your research objectives or questions. Use tables, figures, or charts to help visualize the data where appropriate.
  • Descriptive Statistics / Summaries: If applicable, provide descriptive statistics (e.g., means, frequencies, percentages) to give an overview of the data.
  • Inferential Statistics / Analytical Results: Report any statistical analyses or tests you performed, including test statistics, p-values, confidence intervals, or effect sizes.
  • Qualitative or Thematic Findings: If you used qualitative methods, summarize key themes, categories, or patterns that emerged from your data.
  • Comparison with Previous Research: Discuss how your findings relate to or differ from previous studies or established knowledge in the field.
  • Interpretation of Findings: Go beyond just stating results—interpret what they mean in the context of your research objectives or hypothesis.
  • Implications of Results: Explain the broader implications of your findings, including how they contribute to the field, practice, or future research directions.
  • Limitations and Considerations: Acknowledge any limitations in your results (e.g., small sample size, methodological challenges) and how these might affect your interpretations.
  • Conclusion / Link to Objectives: End by tying your findings back to your research objectives or questions. Highlight the key takeaways and how they advance understanding of the problem you identified.
  • Summary of Key Findings: Begin by briefly restating the main findings of your study, focusing on those most directly linked to your research objectives or hypothesis.
  • Implications for the Field: Highlight how your study contributes to the field, addressing the significance of your findings and how they might inform policy, practice, or future research.
  • Practical Applications: If relevant, discuss how your results can be applied in real-world contexts—such as improving practices, informing decision-making, or guiding interventions.
  • Study Limitations: Acknowledge any remaining limitations in your study and explain how these might affect the generalizability or application of your findings.
  • Recommendations for Future Research: Suggest areas where further investigation is needed to build on your findings, resolve unanswered questions, or explore related topics.
  • Final Conclusion / Takeaway Message: End with a clear, concise concluding statement that reinforces the key message of your study and its relevance to your field.
Include a brief statement discussing how your study contributes to existing literature on the relevant subject matter. Include a list of relevant and credible sources to back your entire work. Be sure to follow one of the major academic reference styles, mainly APA, Harvard, and MLA.
  • Times New Roman: Double Spaced.
  • Sufficient Length: Minimum of 10-15 pages.